From 959fb43dd0922514d591d0fb8d8c9891013e000e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Benjamin Loison Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 16:41:23 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Update annotations of `Determining Image Origin and Integrity Using Sensor Noise` --- ... and Integrity Using Sensor Noise.xopp.xml | 33 +++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/articles/Determining Image Origin and Integrity Using Sensor Noise/Determining Image Origin and Integrity Using Sensor Noise.xopp.xml b/articles/Determining Image Origin and Integrity Using Sensor Noise/Determining Image Origin and Integrity Using Sensor Noise.xopp.xml index 420d51c..6318dd5 100644 --- a/articles/Determining Image Origin and Integrity Using Sensor Noise/Determining Image Origin and Integrity Using Sensor Noise.xopp.xml +++ b/articles/Determining Image Origin and Integrity Using Sensor Noise/Determining Image Origin and Integrity Using Sensor Noise.xopp.xml @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ pre-process PRNU estimation: 161.00799079 567.06931374 218.33293726 567.06931374 256.81369704 568.32555575 286.41340913 566.80838960 49.99337601 584.28260350 49.99337601 584.28260350 - 101.81743986 609.58791227 101.81743986 628.87543435 228.98437133 628.87543435 228.98437133 609.58791227 101.81743986 609.58791227 + 101.81743986 609.58791227 101.81743986 628.87543435 228.98437133 628.87543435 228.98437133 609.58791227 101.81743986 609.58791227 122.66475182 583.83446972 140.15953242 584.52431373 208.36666345 584.37149655 216.40562635 584.37149655 245.65231128 585.06851712 287.81348424 585.06851712 @@ -324,6 +324,8 @@ it seems correct 547.38250732 711.63006592 563.04162598 713.20178223 326.22406006 724.79919434 357.27578010 724.79919434 371.27832031 725.92346191 540.55891062 725.92346191 + + looks symetric @@ -502,7 +504,7 @@ interpolation step like? 474.84166169 699.74548088 561.62416116 699.74548088 related to DSNU row/column artifacts? - 202.09094238 520.32202148 202.09094238 566.10961914 251.14709473 566.10961914 251.14709473 520.32202148 202.09094238 520.32202148 + 202.09094238 520.32202148 202.09094238 566.10961914 251.14709473 566.10961914 251.14709473 520.32202148 202.09094238 520.32202148 282.03369141 541.94891357 282.03369141 541.94891357 99.37377930 736.74072266 176.71927425 736.74072266 288.54211426 625.82409668 332.89267338 791.34263666 @@ -558,7 +560,6 @@ interpolation step 49.74739768 194.87029777 150.82223145 194.87029777 161.86228350 199.55686459 284.44012557 199.55686459 47.94201811 211.53983124 174.57627363 211.53983124 - 79.05132199 267.71257889 105.03966276 266.19282872 132.93996764 266.34940155 284.88310179 266.34940155 46.58263656 280.75720417 134.00396746 280.75720417 264.19836628 280.38895032 264.19836628 280.38895032 @@ -571,9 +572,7 @@ interpolation step 46.65155332 255.03350881 70.65269958 255.03350881 279.06277239 279.65458641 283.67143111 280.01799780 48.74759390 295.11279902 150.13120123 295.11279902 - 174.54869294 294.44279947 284.32447075 294.44279947 48.63887818 305.97223960 283.79334980 305.97223960 - 48.77524888 317.70476034 284.62337179 317.70476034 49.06749883 329.07175111 105.61027144 329.07175111 same for rows only b), no? and maybe not even completelly @@ -616,7 +615,6 @@ looks like 325.07551209 592.86715925 346.86915340 592.86715925 377.21703900 592.41234645 562.28046397 592.41234645 326.50792146 608.48330663 479.66306678 608.48330663 - 360.59247482 370.80607769 452.64693660 370.80607769 514.22366308 371.76900816 557.38101675 371.76900816 458.99981034 463.46420414 470.08650104 466.43487396 @@ -666,6 +664,14 @@ looks like 189.26515185 710.79883821 284.54188281 710.79883821 50.59094390 723.90701672 253.79754975 723.90701672 linear pattern no more used in the paper remaining? + + I would say so + 77.36680671 266.77457951 105.32560725 266.77457951 + 49.83436819 318.45416063 104.86556001 318.45416063 + 116.09129759 317.71348456 127.88697143 317.71348456 + 174.70490350 294.90435777 280.83886827 294.90435777 + 137.26980896 318.58916250 234.61128724 318.58916250 + 244.33716646 317.79588890 284.72031118 317.79588890 @@ -681,6 +687,12 @@ looks like 49.38160289 120.23517199 287.97784415 120.23517199 51.18786520 133.24085582 201.20899173 133.24085582 may not be a priority yet + 345.11083984 718.51214600 361.60607910 719.45687866 + 396.40270996 718.35711670 532.32865787 718.35711670 + 543.27062988 719.13293457 563.53151785 719.13293457 + 324.80279541 728.58267212 414.21831138 728.58267212 + 445.66253662 728.08563232 518.73687931 728.08563232 + 525.60906982 733.28280640 564.51665269 733.28280640 @@ -783,6 +795,15 @@ or it means same variance 3 in 2 axes? 363.90540440 434.30973228 450.11237753 434.30973228 83.86952710 447.96457155 168.35629760 447.96457155 not what I currently focus on + 81.10058594 499.19949341 172.92970161 499.19949341 + 184.36288452 499.31890869 283.83523838 499.31890869 + 49.38739014 513.39700317 123.53056626 513.39700317 + 164.43695068 512.03060913 285.01905971 512.03060913 + 52.24731445 525.21170044 208.48457071 525.21170044 + 180.31701660 461.88165283 267.65657092 461.88165283 + 49.54467773 473.95095825 127.04103509 473.95095825 + 58.35455322 467.99813843 114.09543677 467.99813843 + 58.82684326 491.09954834 163.31633298 491.09954834