|
|
ccb2b4bd86
|
#21: Write PRNU as such to make figures clearer
|
2024-03-26 03:15:34 +01:00 |
|
|
|
f181a3498c
|
Correct Image wuthout PRNU rendering and precise that it is the first image
|
2024-03-26 01:45:47 +01:00 |
|
|
|
03f52a5bd1
|
Finish Matplotlib figure showing PRNU estimation by averaging
|
2024-03-25 20:45:51 +01:00 |
|
|
|
2baf9c3000
|
Add and use rmsDiffNumpy
|
2024-03-25 20:14:33 +01:00 |
|
|
|
7c7cbad0ef
|
Rename rmsdiff to rmsDiffPil
|
2024-03-25 20:01:51 +01:00 |
|
|
|
8b0b58953d
|
WIP: Matplotlib figure showing PRNU estimation by averaging
Committed to showcase
Benjamin_Loison/Pillow#4.
|
2024-03-25 19:45:46 +01:00 |
|
|
|
044d25cbaa
|
Add and use showImageWithMatplotlib
|
2024-03-25 18:37:09 +01:00 |
|
|
|
8575da5b1d
|
WIP: Getting PRNU by averaging on fake dataset
|
2024-03-25 17:45:01 +01:00 |
|
|
|
cf22ff2694
|
Add comments
|
2024-03-22 12:59:52 +01:00 |
|
|
|
d818714344
|
CAI over images mean does not seem better
|
2024-03-22 12:57:24 +01:00 |
|
|
|
464e43861b
|
Prefer *mean* over *average*
|
2024-03-22 12:54:34 +01:00 |
|
|
|
41926663b7
|
Correct a typo but PRNU classifier still looking random
|
2024-03-22 12:51:34 +01:00 |
|
|
|
36f5b69f5e
|
First PRNU classifier acting randomly it seems
|
2024-03-22 12:46:13 +01:00 |
|
|
|
a9adf2d53d
|
Compare RMS difference between average images and the average CAI images
#9 (comment)
|
2024-03-22 12:11:26 +01:00 |
|
|
|
452dd755fc
|
First PRNU distance test
|
2024-03-22 11:58:34 +01:00 |
|
|
|
92ede944c7
|
Not satisfying due to zero offset
|
2024-03-22 11:42:47 +01:00 |
|
|
|
c287d5f0ef
|
Add an use toPilImage
|
2024-03-22 11:39:51 +01:00 |
|
|
|
674025fa62
|
First iteration of fake dataset generation
|
2024-03-22 11:20:07 +01:00 |
|
|
|
876ce96a58
|
Add datasets/fake/generate_dataset.py
|
2024-03-22 10:31:47 +01:00 |
|
|
|
408b7a2ba9
|
Add flat vision dataset size computation
It is about 8.7 GB.
|
2024-03-21 17:15:56 +01:00 |
|
