Benjamin_Loison/Robust_image_source_identification_on_modern_smartphones
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 68 Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Denoising time electricity consumption order of magnitude #60

New Issue
Closed
opened 2024-04-30 01:19:36 +02:00 by Benjamin_Loison · 0 comments
Benjamin_Loison commented 2024-04-30 01:19:36 +02:00
Owner
Copy Link

168 hours (that is 7 days) for 259 Rafael 23/04/24 images using less than 450 Wh PSU (LDLC QS-450+ Quality Select 80PLUS Gold).

Does not seem to be the associated electricity offer but to have an order of magnitude:

https://particulier.edf.fr/content/dam/2-Actifs/Documents/Offres/Grille_prix_Tarif_Bleu.pdf

6 kVa if I remember correctly

0.2516 * 0.450 * 168 = 19 €. I have significant doubts about this cost estimation.

Let us focus on CPU (Intel Core i7-4790K (4.0 GHz)) TPU, it is about 88 W according to the manufacturer.

So 0.2516 * 0.450 * 88 = 9.97 € seems a more correct upperbound but in fact the denoiser is only consuming a single color so 9.97 / 8 = 1.43 € seems to be a good approximation.

Related to #53.

168 hours (that is 7 days) for [259 Rafael 23/04/24 images](https://gitea.lemnoslife.com/Benjamin_Loison/Robust_image_source_identification_on_modern_smartphones/issues/59#issuecomment-1726) using less than 450 Wh PSU (LDLC QS-450+ Quality Select 80PLUS Gold). Does not seem to be the associated electricity offer but to have an order of magnitude: https://particulier.edf.fr/content/dam/2-Actifs/Documents/Offres/Grille_prix_Tarif_Bleu.pdf 6 kVa if I remember correctly 0.2516 * 0.450 * 168 = 19 €. I have significant doubts about this cost estimation. Let us focus on CPU (Intel Core i7-4790K (4.0 GHz)) TPU, it is about 88 W [according to the manufacturer](https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/80807/intel-core-i7-4790k-processor-8m-cache-up-to-4-40-ghz.html). So 0.2516 * 0.450 * 88 = 9.97 € seems a more correct upperbound but in fact the denoiser is only consuming a single color so 9.97 / 8 = 1.43 € seems to be a good approximation. Related to #53.
Benjamin_Loison added the
enhancement
low priority
quick
 labels 2024-04-30 04:11:22 +02:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels   
bug

Something is not working

  
Context-Adaptive Interpolator

   
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature

  
epic

A task that is going to take more than a day to complete.

  
help wanted

Need some help

  
high priority

   
invalid

Something is wrong

  
left for future work

   
low priority

   
medium

A task that should take less than a day to complete.

  
medium priority

   
meta

   
question

More information is needed

  
quick

A task that should take less than two hours to complete.

  
wontfix

This won't be fixed

No Label
bug
Context-Adaptive Interpolator
duplicate
enhancement
epic
help wanted
high priority
invalid
left for future work
low priority
medium
medium priority
meta
question
quick
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: Benjamin_Loison/Robust_image_source_identification_on_modern_smartphones#60
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?