From 4a11ac41967b2bbe4e5503c916120f962bf79f46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Benjamin Loison <Benjamin_Loison@users.noreply.gitea.lemnoslife.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 04:09:35 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fix #51: These last days the algorithm seems to not treat
 completely firstly the starting set of channels before treating discovered
 channels

I verified that this commit solves the issue by treating only `CHANNELS` tab of the channels in `channels.txt`.
---
 main.cpp | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/main.cpp b/main.cpp
index 0fcebc0..49da151 100644
--- a/main.cpp
+++ b/main.cpp
@@ -631,7 +631,8 @@ void addChannelToTreat(unsigned short threadId, string channelId)
     channelsAlreadyTreatedAndToTreatMutex.lock();
     if(channelsAlreadyTreated.find(channelId) == channelsAlreadyTreated.end() && channelsToTreatRev.find(channelId) == channelsToTreatRev.end())
     {
-        unsigned int channelsToTreatIndex = channelsToTreat.end()->first + 1;
+        // It is unclear to me why `channelsToTreat.end()->first + 1` doesn't work here.
+        unsigned int channelsToTreatIndex = channelsToTreat.rbegin()->first + 1;
         channelsToTreat[channelsToTreatIndex] = channelId;
         channelsToTreatRev[channelId] = channelsToTreatIndex;