Maybe it is for safety, such that even if the client (Firefox for instance) should also confirms opening another protocol (Firefox correctly asks), it does not rely on such security, at least for the document owner.
Like `mid:`.
Maybe it is for safety, such that even if the client (Firefox for instance) should also confirms opening another protocol (Firefox correctly asks), it does not rely on such security, at least for the document owner.
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Like
mid:.Maybe it is for safety, such that even if the client (Firefox for instance) should also confirms opening another protocol (Firefox correctly asks), it does not rely on such security, at least for the document owner.
At least with
<other>mid:works as wanted.Related to #25 already consists in a confirmation, even for such
<other>protocol, I verified withmid:.