Estimate PRNU of devices on actual dataset and evaluate our method #30
Labels
No Label
bug
Context-Adaptive Interpolator
duplicate
enhancement
epic
help wanted
high priority
invalid
left for future work
low priority
medium
medium priority
meta
question
quick
wontfix
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: Benjamin_Loison/Robust_image_source_identification_on_modern_smartphones#30
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Considering first a RAW dataset of uniform objects (sky for instance) with one instance of each model seems to be a good starting point.
All flat-field images for NikonD7000 (source) look like attached.
They seem to have a brightness source near the middle and quite isotropic, there is just a shadow at top-right:
http://loki.disi.unitn.it/RAISE/getFile.php?p=all
Keyword
are just the few categories of http://loki.disi.unitn.it/RAISE/download.html.Only first two
Keyword
columns containlandscape
entries.seems to be a single cell and not 2 cells with the second starting with space.
46,246.04 MB
The most clearest figure would be a 2D table having a colormap and actual accuracy values written in each cell to show the accurracy of our method for all values for both number of images to learn the PRNU and to evalute it. Paying attention to the complexity to make this doable, if even possible initially.
How many images per device is there?
What is the resolution per device?
Have to pay attention to compare identical and meaningful same resolution images. Cropping to smallest 3008 x 2000 seems to make sense.
Could split the images to have more of them especially for Nikon D40 to have 17 * 2 * 2 = 68 images seems to be a good start.
Note that sometimes the resolution is reversed as it is not an horizontal but a vertical image it seems.
Image Size
does not change. Unclear differences amongPicture Control
andBase
values.Maybe pay attention to camera settings potentially affecting the PRNU computation.
Manually processed:
Should get rid of columns with identical values, especially the empty ones.
Should compute the number of images across devices per category.
The idea is to consider the category with maximum images per device I would say.
According to:
download_images.py
: