#31: Can for instance for a given device split into two groups and compare both estimated PRNUs and how they evolved when consider more and more images to estimate them within each group.
#30: Otherwise can estimate PRNUs for each device of a dataset and then use new images of these devices to estimate what device they are associated to and can monitor the performances thanks to the accuracy.
I would expect a software showing me not demosaiced RGB but it is not the case of darktable, GIMP and vpv by default for .nef and .tif...
- #31: Can for instance for a given device split into two groups and compare both estimated PRNUs and how they evolved when consider more and more images to estimate them within each group.
- #30: Otherwise can estimate PRNUs for each device of a dataset and then use new images of these devices to estimate what device they are associated to and can monitor the performances thanks to the accuracy.
I would expect a software showing me not demosaiced RGB but it is not the case of darktable, GIMP and vpv by default for `.nef` and `.tif`...
Related to #3 and #49.
Tried estimating PRNU on not flat-field PNG from NEF images but I get the following for `Nikon D7000` 4946x3278 4,651 images:
```
100%|█████████████████████████████████████| 8156/8156 [00:02<00:00, 3852.64it/s]
100%|█████████████████████████████████████| 4651/4651 [5:47:23<00:00, 4.48s/it]
```

not being really interesting it seems as almost all pixels are black.
Related to #48.
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
I would expect a software showing me not demosaiced RGB but it is not the case of darktable, GIMP and vpv by default for
.nefand.tif...Related to #3 and #49.
Tried estimating PRNU on not flat-field PNG from NEF images but I get the following for
Nikon D70004946x3278 4,651 images:not being really interesting it seems as almost all pixels are black.
Related to #48.