Is img_as_float
more precise than .convert('F')
#33
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
I would say so as the result still has the 3 channels for
img_as_float
contrarily to.convert('F')
.Hence computation seems to take more time:
Can proceed in parallel somehow if it is not already the case? It seems to only consume a single core.
Note that I have 16 cores on my laptop and 24 on my computer.
Using gzip only reduces
369M
to343M
. Note that if want to mean then have to pay attention as all images may not fit in 32 GB of memory. Could otherwise use an OVH C2-120 with 32vCores and 120 GB of RAM at €1.48 ex. VAT/hour.Could compute mean in real-time to avoid too much storing.
With
Pool(30)
logs attached.Should understand what is blocking, otherwise can rent many small instances.
Related to #8 and #19.
Computing the PRNU estimate on the 100 images flat-field images for NikonD7000
Seems to have possibly interesting PRNU pattern attached (
_{0,1}
are different GIMPBrightness-Contrast...
rendering).Are we seeing how the camera internally works? What are the yellow dot and circles? Is it related to Wikipedia: Machine Identification Code?
Is it like figure I a of the internship offer?
Should use a slider to compare both images like leafmap.org/notebooks/76_image_comparison/.
What would be interesting would be able to do so in GIMP to be able to modify the brightness and contrast.
Related to Benjamin_Loison/gimp/issues/22.