How proceed in justice cases, as methods seem to not be extremely sure #8
Labels
No Label
bug
Context-Adaptive Interpolator
duplicate
enhancement
epic
help wanted
high priority
invalid
left for future work
low priority
medium
medium priority
meta
question
quick
wontfix
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: Benjamin_Loison/Robust_image_source_identification_on_modern_smartphones#8
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
See
On the Sensor Pattern Noise Estimation in Image Forensics: A Systematic Empirical Evaluation.pdf
table III.Using many images seem to improve the PRNU estimation but in justice cases we do not have tens of images, do we? Could think that images not criminal related but regular images could do the job but then most of the estimated PRNU is not for the criminal related case, so does not seem correct.
Correlation just gives between absolutely 0 and 1 if both signal match but may have the same correlation for a single image as for a whole dataset so can take into account the quantity to define the confidence?